<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Censorship Redeux: The Smithsonian and MOCA LA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeannewillette.com/2010/12/19/censorship-redeux-the-smithsonian-and-moca-la/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeannewillette.com/2010/12/19/censorship-redeux-the-smithsonian-and-moca-la/</link>
	<description>The Arts Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 08:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice Kinston</title>
		<link>http://jeannewillette.com/2010/12/19/censorship-redeux-the-smithsonian-and-moca-la/comment-page-1/#comment-39396</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice Kinston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeannewillette.com/?p=291#comment-39396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[magnificent points altogether, you simply gained a new reader. What would you recommend about your submit that you just made some days in the past? Any positive?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>magnificent points altogether, you simply gained a new reader. What would you recommend about your submit that you just made some days in the past? Any positive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanne</title>
		<link>http://jeannewillette.com/2010/12/19/censorship-redeux-the-smithsonian-and-moca-la/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeannewillette.com/?p=291#comment-4293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your response. I appreciate thoughtful readers, such as yourself.  I agree. Let the Public decide.  Public Art is for the Public, after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response. I appreciate thoughtful readers, such as yourself.  I agree. Let the Public decide.  Public Art is for the Public, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira Mency</title>
		<link>http://jeannewillette.com/2010/12/19/censorship-redeux-the-smithsonian-and-moca-la/comment-page-1/#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira Mency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeannewillette.com/?p=291#comment-4278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so happy to read this, as referred by Robin above.  Being an artist I think it&#039;s absurd to censor works--people deserve a right to view other people&#039;s views or creations.  Perhaps it is their fear of the public thinking by having such artwork, the museum or display house agrees with it&#039;s content, but as an artist we know this is not so.  Perhaps they ought have one giant display just on the subjective contact creations. I would have to create something off the cuff just for that to prove a point.  Let the public decide. It makes me sick as freedom of speech is not so free anymore it seems now it&#039;s these stuffy censors that are telling us what we can and can&#039;t draw, create, or display. Many movies grossing 100 million, or an episode of CSI are in my opinion more harmful and gory to view than a statue of a bloody Jesus.  How soon they forget that on every topic there can be right, wrong, and somewhere in between. It is the grey area they are scared of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so happy to read this, as referred by Robin above.  Being an artist I think it&#8217;s absurd to censor works&#8211;people deserve a right to view other people&#8217;s views or creations.  Perhaps it is their fear of the public thinking by having such artwork, the museum or display house agrees with it&#8217;s content, but as an artist we know this is not so.  Perhaps they ought have one giant display just on the subjective contact creations. I would have to create something off the cuff just for that to prove a point.  Let the public decide. It makes me sick as freedom of speech is not so free anymore it seems now it&#8217;s these stuffy censors that are telling us what we can and can&#8217;t draw, create, or display. Many movies grossing 100 million, or an episode of CSI are in my opinion more harmful and gory to view than a statue of a bloody Jesus.  How soon they forget that on every topic there can be right, wrong, and somewhere in between. It is the grey area they are scared of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Ptacek</title>
		<link>http://jeannewillette.com/2010/12/19/censorship-redeux-the-smithsonian-and-moca-la/comment-page-1/#comment-4078</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Ptacek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeannewillette.com/?p=291#comment-4078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Jeanne, 
Thank you for this excellent summary and commentary on the current batch of censorship. The Republican (conservative) gains in the mid-term elections seem to have encouraged censors to come out from under their rocks. The art community needs to be ever-vigilant, especially to misguided art administrators who consider the &quot;Botttom line&quot; of donations and funding over freedom of speech.
In both of these cases, but especially that of Wojnarowicz, no one forces people to look. Censors, like too many other conservatives, want to control what others see, to control everybody else&#039;s lives -- power and control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jeanne,<br />
Thank you for this excellent summary and commentary on the current batch of censorship. The Republican (conservative) gains in the mid-term elections seem to have encouraged censors to come out from under their rocks. The art community needs to be ever-vigilant, especially to misguided art administrators who consider the &#8220;Botttom line&#8221; of donations and funding over freedom of speech.<br />
In both of these cases, but especially that of Wojnarowicz, no one forces people to look. Censors, like too many other conservatives, want to control what others see, to control everybody else&#8217;s lives &#8212; power and control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.777 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-18 16:36:40 -->
